
APS
President, Paul BJ
Ransbury,
pictured with
Mr. John Cox prior to flying
|
John Cox, President
Safety Operating Systems, Washington D.C.
2004 Executive Air Safety Chairman,
Air Line Pilots Association
A Small Sampling of John's
Recognitions
* Appointed member of the
International Society of Air
Safety Investigators
* Master Air Pilot Certificate
* Air Line Pilots Association
Air Safety Award
(ALPA's highest safety
award)
* Air Line Pilots Association
Leadership Award
* Air Line Pilots Association
Steering and Oversight Award
* US Airways Safety
Achievement
(US Airways highest
safety award)
|
|
APS Emergency Maneuver Training had the distinct
pleasure of hosting Mr. John Cox, President of
Safety Operating Systems based in Washington, D.C.
on 21 February. John flew with APS President Paul BJ
Ransbury while participating in a condensed upset
recovery program to evaluate the course's training
effectiveness for various levels of aviators,
specifically airline category pilots and to confirm
APS's alignment with the second edition of the FAA
Airplane Upset Recovery Training Aid (see below).
Comments by John Cox on his experience at APS: "I
fully agree that the way APS is teaching Upset
Recovery Training is transferable to all aircraft
and is aligned with the techniques and concepts
taught to airline pilots as detailed in the FAA
Airplane Upset Recovery Training Aid - Revision 1.
As a compliment to APS's well-balanced program, the
company has a team of very talented instructors each
having professional air carrier pilot experience as
well as military and general aviation piloting
backgrounds ... APS's thorough ground instruction is
complementary to the in-flight training. The Extra
300 is an excellent aircraft for providing upset
recovery training while maximizing student safety."
Presentation
at the World Airline Training Conference (WATS)
John presented a precis on "Upset Recovery and the
Upset Recovery Training Aid" at the WATS conference
in Dallas, Texas in April 2005. Over the past
several years, he has traveled around the world
diligently promoting the need for an increased level
of pilot skills in the area of upset recovery.
Suitably developed courses would resolve current
training deficiencies that contribute to incidents
directly related to Loss of Control In-Flight
(LCIF). LCIF refers to accidents resulting from
situations in which the pilot should have maintained
or regained aircraft control but did not. This is
the leading cause of U.S. airline fatal accidents as
well as the leading cause of commercial aviation
accidents worldwide. The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) requires each U.S. airline to
develop a training program for pilots based on its
specific operations and aircraft.
FAA Airplane
Upset Recovery Training Aid
In 1998, the industry and FAA published the Airplane
Upset Recovery Training Aid that can be accessed by clicking here.
The goal of the training aid is to increase the
pilot's ability to recognize and avoid situations
that can lead to airplane upset and improve the
pilot's ability to recover control of an airplane
that has exceeded the normal flight regime. This
goal may be accomplished by increasing awareness of
potential upset situations and knowledge of flight
dynamics, and by applying this knowledge to
simulator training scenarios. The training aid
consists of an overview for airline management,
pilot guide to upset recovery, an example of an
upset recovery training program, references for
additional information, and a video.The
training aid was revised during August 2004 to
address characteristics, limitations, and procedures
involving components of transport category airplanes
such as rudder, vertical stabilizer and others. Press
Release - Fact Sheet
Industry
Development
There are several leaders in the field of Upset
Recovery Training that are aligning efforts and
resources to improve flight safety around the world
and to save lives. The ultimate goal would be to
create standardized recovery techniques that are
taught to pilots during initial certification
training and reinforced throughout their careers.
The ideal program would include training in both
simulators and real aircraft. This type of course
will require specific regulatory guidelines to
ensure current and future pilots develop skills that
will vastly decrease the rate of LCIF incidents.
Training providers and agencies coming together
include, but are not limited to:
Safety Operating Systems, APS Emergency Maneuver Training,
General Dynamics,
Air Line Pilots Association,
Boeing,
Airbus
and the
FAA.
|